Highly Recommended Book: Jesus Girls by Hannah Faith Notess (ed.)

Jesus Girls: True Tales of Growing Up Female and Evangelical by Hannah Faith Notess (editor)
[September 2009; reviewed 12-29-2009]
Jesus Girls: True Tales of Growing Up Female and Evangelical. The title made me think that the authors intended to spend most of their pages complaining about the treatment of women in evangelical Christianity, a “Festivus: Airing of Grievances” for evangelical and post-evangelical women. Here, I thought, I would find tales of heartache over bad teachings on submission, being silent in church, and hyper-modesty. Here attention would be given to how overwhelmingly androcentric evangelical thought, worship and life can be and how that can make women feel marginalized and undervalued. I could certainly sympathize with such a message, and perhaps my expectations say as much about my own biases as they do about evangelical culture in general.
The good news is, I was wrong. Delightfully, happily wrong. Jesus Girls provided a treat for the heart and soul quite unlike any work on evangelical Christianity I had ever read.
In the book’s introduction, editor Hannah Faith Notess lays out the concept of the “un-testimony.” Evangelical Christians are widely expected to develop a testimony narrative for which the basic formula is, “I was a sinner doing all kinds of awful things, I found Jesus, now life is better.” According to Notess, “The basic narrative of evangelical experience has survived virtually unchanged in this form for several centuries, longer if you count the famous conversion stories of Saints Paul and Augustine. When I was growing up, the best testimonies came from ex-angry young men, ex-drug addicts, ex-fornicators, et cetera. The more spectacularly wicked you had been, the better Jesus looked for having saved you.” (xi)
However, not everyone who comes into the fold of evangelicalism has such an experience, and often those who lack one feel out-of-place and forlorn. It is in that regard that Jesus Girls is a volume of un-testimonies: stories of life as an evangelical Christian that do not follow the traditional formula.
The book is divided into five topics with four or five essays devoted to each: Community, Worship, Education, Gender & Sex, and Story & Identity, with a different author behind each essay. All sorts of backgrounds are covered, from Southern Baptist to African Methodist Episcopal to Mennonite, and there’s even an essay on Catholics which provides a beautiful example of Krister Stendahl’s “holy envy.” Not all of the essays come from those who are active evangelicals today. Some of them end with the author finding her way out of evangelicalism or out of Christianity altogether.
And what of those “women’s issues” I listed in my first paragraph? Well, they are covered. Some of the essays cover them more directly than others, such as “Feminist-in-Waiting” by Kimberly B. George or “The Journey toward Ordination” by Heather Baker Utley. More often the authors touch on them briefly in passing, though most of the essays make no mention of them at all.  And hey, what volume by female evangelicals or post-evangelicals would be complete without mentioning a few of Elisabeth Elliot’s stinkers on gender and sexuality?
For the most part, however, Jesus Girls is not about women in evangelical Christianity. It’s about evangelical Christianity as seen through the eyes of women. These women are clever, they’re sassy, they’re innovative, and they know what good writing is. Back in April of 2007, when LDS filmmaker Richard Dutcher announced that he was leaving the Mormon faith, he complained that Mormon cinema too often gives the audience a “polite, remedial and not-so-factual recitation of Mormon History” when Mormon stories ought to be “the most powerful films on the face of the earth,” that “[v]iewers should leave those films weak in the knees, their minds reeling, their spirits soaring.” I’ve often (but not always) felt the same way about reading evangelical narratives: polite, remedial, and not-so-factual, when evangelical narratives ought to be some of the most powerful stories in the world. That’s why I’m so pleased to report thatJesus Girls serves up a robust helping of the latter. It made my mind reel and my spirit soar.
There’s no getting around the fact that this book highlights a number of evangelical Christianity’s failings, especially concerning its treatment of women. These failings are real and they are painful to ponder. However, I firmly believe that talking about these problems is the first step toward remedying them, and so Jesus Girls is commendable in that regard. Beyond its focus on problems and doubt, Jesus Girls still manages to provide a breathtaking glimpse of evangelical Christianity’s beauty. It is that beauty that continues to captivate me and keep me in the fold despite my own feelings of disappointment and doubt.
Whatever your interest in evangelical Christianity—whether you are an outsider who wishes to understand us better or an insider who is still defining the parameters of your own evangelical identity—if you fail to read Jesus Girls, you are missing a treat.
Grade: A
———————-
I especially want to thank the following authors, whose essays I enjoyed and empathized with the most:
Anne Dayton ~ “Going Way against the Flow” in Community
Nicole Sheets ~ “Keep the Feast” in Worship
Stephanie Tombari ~ “Heal Me” in Worship
Angie Romines ~ “Catholic Club” in Education
Kirsten Cruzen ~ “Surviving the Call to Missions” in Education
Audrey Molina ~ “Jesus Wants Me for a Comedian” in Education
Melanie Springer Mock ~ “Inventing a Testimony” in Story & Identity
Andrea Palpant Dilley ~ “Why Isn’t God like Eric Clapton?” in Story & Identity
Heather Baker Utley ~ “The Journey toward Ordination” in Story & Identity

Comments

Highly Recommended Book: Jesus Girls by Hannah Faith Notess (ed.)— 18 Comments

  1. Tragically, my Virginia library does not have it. Maybe I’ll put in a request, because your review makes the book sound excellent.
    I remember as a teenager thinking that if I hadn’t had some amazing manifestation or other single event that I could point to that changes my life then I didn’t really have a testimony. While I don’t doubt the power of such experiences, I have learned that there is also power in quiet faith that builds over the years through countless small trials and Christlike actions. Or at least that is what I tell myself. :)
  2. Jack quotes the author as saying:
    When I was growing up, the best testimonies came from ex-angry young men, ex-drug addicts, ex-fornicators, et cetera. The more spectacularly wicked you had been, the better Jesus looked for having saved you.
    That is definitely true when I was growing up in an evangelical church. It was amazing how quickly an evil rock star (or whatever) could become an instant authority on the Christian faith and go on the evangelical speaking circuit. Would you say that’s still true today in the evangelical subculture?
    I’m just curious. I’ve been out of touch with the subculture for a while.
  3. I haven’t seen a lot of former “spectacular sinners” get moved to the speaking circuit quickly. I have heard testimonies from such people before, but usually when I heard them, they’ve been in ministry for years.
    I did always feel like my testimony didn’t fit the narrative very well. I prayed to ask Jesus to be my Savior when I was 10. What had I done at that point that was really bad? It wasn’t really salvation from my sins that appealed to me at the time, though I’ve come to appreciate that more since then. It was the idea of a personal God who would love no me no matter what I did and was always thinking of me.
    One of the essays in there that I really appreciated, “Inventing a Testimony” by Melanie Springer Mock, is about how Mock, as a Mennonite who attended an evangelical college, had never had experience with these meetings where people bear their testimonies. She felt like she hadn’t ever really done anything spectacularly wicked and had always quietly believed in Jesus, but her peers wanted her to give a testimony. So, she sort of “faked it.” She edited her life’s narrative so that the puff on a cigar she took once was the start of a smoking addiction and the sip of beer her grandfather gave her was the start of an alcohol addiction, etc.
    Her real sins and the things she felt that God had helped her with—pride, envy, and looking down on others—just weren’t interesting enough.
    I hope evangelicals can reach a point where narratives other than the standard one become more common and acceptable.
  4. I hope evangelicals can reach a point where narratives other than the standard one become more common and acceptable.
    I’d say the same thing of LDS testimonies. But that’s a whole other subject.
    I think I’d find that book interesting. I really need to start a book budget of some sort.
  5. Yeah, I always wondered about that.
    What happens if you aren’t a recovering alcoholic in an Evangelical congregation?
    Do you have to hang with the “less cool” crowd or something.
    Like us people in LDS congregations who aren’t disposed to crying at the pulpit?
  6. You know, that raises an interesting question for my LDS readers:
    Do you ladies and gentlemen actually go to the pulpit on F&T Sundays and testify using the “I know this church is true” formula?
  7. No. I usually stick to the “I know that this church is the only organization authorized by Jesus to exercise salvific ordinances such as baptism, and that all other churches, however sincere, are incomplete.”
    I will say, “I know the Book of Mormon is true” and that “This is Christ’s church” but I don’t think saying “this is the true Church” is a proper excuse for the number of problematic people in it, especially the stuck up, immoral, married ones.
  8. The tendency to favor dramatic testimonies is definitely there. There are a couple funny LarkNews articles about it: http://www.larknews.com/march_2006/secondary.php?page=2 andhttp://www.larknews.com/november_2004/secondary.php?page=4
    I’m not sure how much that really applies outside of testimony sharing, though. In summer 2008 I did this leadership program at a Christian summer camp with some other 11th and 12th graders and at one point we all had to learn how to share our testimonies effectively. Those with “boring” testimonies did struggle trying to find a way to make some kind of narrative out of it, but those of us who had been through rougher times also had a hard time with it. Even if it’s a good story, you wonder what people will think of you, especially when it’s people who have never really done anything wrong. (Not that I’ve really done anything, but I’ve struggled for years with eating disorders and ocd and depression and stuff.) It was an amazing experience and I’m so glad I did it despite my hesitations, but I did really wish I had a “boring” testimony.
    I think maybe the ideal (and I mean that in the way people react, not what actually is ideal) testimony is when something has happened to you. People are awed by how God has helped you through the difficult times, and there’s no judgment.
    As an aside, when I started interacting with LDS people, the idea of testimony sharing really confused me, since it’s a lot different in the Evangelical world. I didn’t think I’d ever heard a testimony from the missionaries I talked to, but it turns out that’s what they were doing every time I asked a question and they responded by tearfully telling me how much they know their church is true. (Okay, that’s probably not very nice. The first missionary I talked to was wonderful, and her companion was nice, though had little to say, but I got a bit frustrated with the one who replaced her.)
    As for the original subject of the post, I would love to read that book if I can get it.
  9. Not once in the last 20 years have I used that formula. I barely hear it any more among adults in my ward, by which I mean virtually never.
  10. I’ve been to several F&T meetings in the DC area (both singles wards and family wards) and just about every testimony I hear has “I know this church is true.” I also hear it regularly from the missionaries who stop by my door. So there.
    Also, I think one of the funnier “intros” I heard when I saw a baptism at an Evangelical church was when the pastor was describing all manners of sins that the woman to be baptized had engaged in, and right after “sorcery” the pastor named “sarcasm.” So see, everyone? We can all put that in our “bad” pile of stuff we’ve been saved from. Oh wait….
  11. Isaiah had sarcasm, so you’re in really good company.
    Whitney, I can’t speak for those Mormons in F&T. I promise you, though, that I know in the core of my soul with every fiber of my being beyond a shadow of a doubt that my Ward is the Only True Ward. ;-)
  12. I barely hear it any more among adults in my ward, by which I mean virtually never.
    For real? What church do you attend? I hear it all the time.
    No, I don’t use the old “I know the church is true” line. Probably because I don’t know the church is true…Hahahahaha.
    (Not sure if that was all that funny for anyone else, but I’m laughing here.) :D
  13. Not once in the last 20 years have I used that formula. I barely hear it any more among adults in my ward, by which I mean virtually never.
    I don’t use the formula either. I hear it frequently, although probably less than I did 10 years ago.
  14. Katie, I spent years in the place you’re in. (Well, not the Mormon Corridor, but that place between ignorance and knowledge…)
    In a lot of ways, I’m still there.
    During that time, whenever I got up to say something in F&T, I used the words, “I believe”. Once or twice this has prompted someone to get up and reassure the congregation that “believe” is just outsider-speak for “know”.
    As for what Church I attend, it’s LDS, but non-Corridor, and maybe that’s the difference?

0 коментарі:

Post a Comment