Temple phobe is not pleased with Big Love

I was only 16 when I looked up the contents of the LDS temple ceremonies using an Internet search engine, and the year was 1998. I can’t even remember why I did it other than that the Mormons told me not to do it. I guess I was one of those teenagers who would have done almost anything someone told me not to do just to annoy the party that told me not to do it, and the endowment sounded mysterious and strange and I wanted to know what went on during it.
I found a web site that had everything: pictures and drawings of garments and temple clothes, transcripts of what goes on during all the different ordinances, descriptions of the ceremony, and specific explanations of the tokens and signs. I read it all, and while some of it sounded creepy and weird (particularly the pre-1990 stuff), most of it sounded really boring. This was the pinnacle of the LDS worship experience, the secrets that Mormons covenanted to guard with their lives? It was anti-climactic.
Then a really strange thing happened. I felt guilty.
My guilt was hard to come to terms with. I wasn’t Mormon and I certainly hadn’t covenanted not to learn about or reveal anything that goes on in the temple. LDS temples had zero significance in my life, so why did I care? And yet, there it was. I found myself caring in spite of my best efforts not to, and I wished I could take it all back.
Mormons are going to read that and say, “Ha! The Spirit was convicting you of the sacred nature of the things you violated.” Well, I agree that the Spirit may have convicted me on this matter, but I interpret things differently. Having learned about what goes on in LDS temples has caused some Latter-day Saints to stop talking with me, while others have refused to believe I have sincere intentions towards them so that the message I try to share is hopelessly tainted. How can I be an ambassador of my faith if the people I want to reach are too offended by something I’ve done to hear me out? In that context, it’s perfectly reasonable to me that God did not want me sifting through transcripts of LDS temple rituals.
This post is not an apology. I apologized for what I did ten years ago. I’m done apologizing, and even if I feel guilty about having pilfered a knowledge of what goes on in temples, please understand that I have zero interest in ever experiencing those things for myself. Garments? I think they’re hideous. Temple clothes? They look ridiculous. And this thing where you get a special name and the wife has to tell her husband her new name but she doesn’t get to learn his? Well, that just bristles my egalitarian feathers. So I admit it, I’m a temple phobe.
Which brings us to the latest episode of Big Love, the one that has caused so much fuss by showing some of what goes on in LDS temples. I haven’t seen this episode yet, but I understand from reading the discussion at By Common Consent and Times and Seasons that the episode showed some of the actual signs and tokens from the ceremony, and this in spite of some other inaccuracies pertaining to the situation.1 I’m left to conclude, based on the comments of others, that the inclusion of these things was completely contrived and gratuitous, done only to earn ratings and upset Mormons. Probably in retaliation for their role in passing Proposition 8.
Of all the things I learned about the temple rituals from contraband sources, the one thing I can’t remember is any of the actual signs or tokens. I think I’d like to keep it that way.
I’ve removed Big Love from my Netflix queue. I won’t watch this show.
————————————————-
1 According to the discussion at BCC and T&S, the following things were not accurate:
Barb (an inactive Mormon) goes to her active LDS mother and begs her to let her borrow her temple recommend so that she can “take out her endowment,” then later attends the temple with her mother and sister. You cannot get into the temple on someone else’s recommend, or at least you can’t do it that easily, and you especially can’t do it with that person. That’s also a continuity error as the show had previously established that Barb was once an active Mormon who married Bill in a temple. She would already be endowed.
While they are sitting in the celestial room in the temple, a temple worker tells them “your 15 minutes are up,” as if there is a time limit on how long you can remain in the celestial room. According to the discussion from faithful Latter-day Saints, you can stay in the celestial room until the temple closes if you like.
I’m wary of criticizing a show I have not seen very much of, but I cannot fathom why they would include the signs and tokens from the endowment when the plot’s premise for Barb being in the temple at all was on such shaky ground. Unless, of course, they just wanted to upset Mormons. Which is what it was.

Comments

Temple phobe is not pleased with Big Love — 25 Comments

  1. It peeves me, but what can you do? And Jack, before I was endowed, I was DYING to know what went on in the temple. I had heard so many crazy rumors, LOL. It turns out that it wasn’t nearly as strange as I’d thought it would be. In fact, it wasn’t strange at all. I don’t blame you one bit for being curious and checking it out, especially since (as you said) you had no ties to the LDS church and were never planning on attending the temple yourself. It doesn’t bother me as much that the show showed the temple; what bothers me are the errors. But yeah, what’s done is done.
  2. I should clarify that the endowment ceremony didn’t *feel* strange to me. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t perceived by others as being strange. I know it is! :)
  3. Jack, great post.
    One other inaccuracy was apparently the altarcloth (the one that is always white and is knitted, crocheted, or “tatted” by sweet old grandma’s was portrayed as black. In an environment where everything is a symbolic (non-racial) white=purified, it seems strangely odd for people who went through “every possibility to be accurate” to have gotten something so simple so wrong.
    Maybe they’re just idiots, but I have the same suspicions you do, I think they have bad motives.
  4. Actually, the reaction I have to your story, Jack, is that you’re simply not sufficiently schooled in the covenants of the Old and New Testaments to recognize how the ordinances in the Temple dovetail with scripture.
    Mind now, I want to be thinking of your much younger self, but I don’t believe you would call these things hideous or ridiculous if you actually understood the relationships there.
    I don’t know why the gender split falls the way it does in the Church, but I also don’t consider it enough of a show stopper to leave it behind.
    “Mormons are going to read that and say, “Ha! The Spirit was convicting you of the sacred nature of the things you violated.””
    Hardly, except to specifically acknowledge an agreement that the Sprit was working with your mind to give you a greater understanding of the importance the Temple rites have to us. That quoted retort sounds to me like an exultation I’d never be willing to offer.
    But yes, the depictions of the elements of the ceremony in that episode appear from the descriptions of others to include the things Mormons explicitly covenant never to reveal, and to contain enough warped-parallel-universe differences that the thing can be accurately labeled “provocative”, “disrespectful”, and even “the most offense they could possibly think to give Mormons,” especially in the context of a disciplinary council.
    To that end, I thank you for your sensitivity.
  5. Finding out that a friend googled my temple covenants would never drive me away. Finding out that said friend is a Buffy fan…that’s hard to swallow.
    I watched the first 1.5 seasons of Big Love. It had some very interesting questions to deal with, but once the soap opera took over (see also, The Office), I turned it off. Yawn.
  6. Rob ~ I’ve read the Old Testament more times than most Protestants (or Mormons I’d wager), since I consider it to be just as important as the New while a lot of people think the New Testament is more relevant. I actually do understand what at least some of the clothing and symbolism in the temple is trying to be.
    Still, just because it was part of the Old Covenant doesn’t mean I wouldn’t find it repellent today.
    Brian ~ I told my husband that if I ever do become Mormon and go through the endowment, I’m gonna tell him my temple name is Buffy. As I see it, if I don’t need to know his name, he doesn’t need to know mine.
    Still wanna be friends with me?
  7. BJ, what an interesting and touching reaction you display in this post. It makes me wonder what your reaction would be if you went through an LDS temple service for real, given that you are already familiar with the “unfamiliar” aspects that put off some first-timers.
  8. Jack, it’s still definitively an incomplete understanding, and it would be more agreeable not to make light of the name given in the Temple.
    Many aspects of the Old Covenant would be repellent to people today. Not the point. Some of the symbols in the Temple rites serve as a reminder that this covenant comes from the same God as that old covenant. And that’s about as far as you can take it.
    Mostly, though, I think of it as a 90 minute prod to read and study the scriptures. No other way to really understand things there.
  9. Thanks for a thoughtful sensitive post. I hope you won’t be offended if I add your blog to my list of daily-read LDS blogs. :-) ..bruce..
  10. Dave ~ It’s nice to see you here, I like your blog. I suppose that if I ever joined the church, it would mean I’d have worked past my issues with the temple. Then again, I worry that I would have a reaction like this.
    Brian ~ BFF!
    Rob ~ Yeah, I knew I was pushing the envelope with my temple names crack. Sorry about that. I try my best but I really do have uncharitable thoughts towards Mormonism sometimes.
    Bruce ~ Can I just say that I love your name? I really wanted to name our child Bruce if it had been a boy, but my husband veto’ed it. Anyways, read and comment all you want, I love having people to discuss things with.
    MadChemist ~ Um, what are you, my seminary teacher? I did do a year of LDS high school seminary y’know. Old Testament even. :P
  11. The only thing I could possibly suggest, Jack, is that you no longer have uncharitable thoughts.
    I’m still working on that one, though. I’ll get back to you when I’ve got it totally surrounded, k thx! ;-)
  12. Okay, the truth: I played World of Warcraft for three years, which involved lots of people posting funny pictures to the realm forums and guild forums. If I saw a funny picture I liked, I saved it. Sometimes we had entire threads for posting motivational posters and LOLcats pictures and stuff.
    Here are some of my favorite funny pictures Web sites, but warning, you may wind up clicking through these for hours and laughing yourself silly:
    And sometimes, I just Google a word or phrase in the Google Image search and see what kind of funny pictures I get to go along with it. That’s how I got the Redneck University diploma for my interfaith marriage post from a few days ago.
    Now you know all my secrets. Use them wisely.
  13. !!! YOU don’t know either! Oh, this is a sad day. :-)
    The cartoon you referenced was from xkcd.com, a Far Side-style comic drawn in stick figures by a physicist named Randall Munroe.
    That is also to say that my, “She doesn’t KNOW” was meant as an inside thing… a bit of a geek out about your choice of pictures, and not a harangue.
    Sorry about this.
  14. If you’re linking to xkcd, this cartoon is perhaps the most applicable to interfaith blogging.
    And Jack, I hope there is room in your heart on your hard drive for Rolcats.
  15. I wish HBO would treat all religions with the same amount of respect. They seem to pull punches with religions like Islam, yet hammer Mormons without much mercy.
  16. I will not fail this great trust you have all put in me. From this time forward, I will strive to use only the funniest pictures in my blogging practices.

0 коментарі:

Post a Comment