Can non-members pass the sacrament at an LDS church?
I was re-reading some of the essays in Women & Authority: Re-emerging Mormon Feminism (1992), a book I first read in high school, and came across this excerpt in the essay “Sister Missionaries and Authority” by Maxine Hanks:
In the mid-1970s a branch in the southern states consulted a visiting general authority about a lack of men to “pass sacrament.” He instructed them to have sisters in the ward pass the sacrament. The stake leadership protested that “they don’t have the priesthood.” He pointed out that when deacons pass sacrament trays to members in the pew, each person is actually “passing the sacrament” to the person next to him or her. So the branch allowed the sisters to pass the sacrament. (p. 325)Source: S. Dilworth Young related this incident in a stake leadership meeting in Colorado Springs in 1978. Young was the visiting general authority who instructed the branch to have sisters pass the sacrament. This incident from the notes in the files of Tim Rathbone, who was present when Young related the story. (p. 333)
Let’s just assume that this story is an accurate account of an actual exception that was made to the LDS sacrament practices. I thought this was interesting because I visit the LDS church with my husband once a month, and usually when I visit, I’m handed the sacrament tray and I pass it on to the person next to me. Using this reasoning, couldn’t non-members theoretically pass the sacrament as well?
Or, is it that visiting non-members theoretically should not be passing the sacrament to the person sitting next to them in the pew, but no one tells them not to because it is neither practical nor polite?
I have no interest in serving the LDS sacrament as the deacons do, this post is an idle musing.
So there is nothing wrong with that.
As for the story above, I would see a doctrinal issue with those not in authority taking the sacrament tray from the Priests an then passing it to multiple people. It shows an extended enough period of time that someone who is ordained should be preforming the action. (but i am not sure)
There are other areas in the church that similar things happen. I.E. the Sunday school teacher getting a substitute to teach the lesson this week, the Elder (missionary) taking a Priest to proselyte door to door for a few hours, The Bishop having his counselor run Sunday meetings while he is on vacation. Etc.
It as matter of giving someone authority to preform something specific for a limited amount of time in order to keep the church running